Hi Shengjing, On 18-05-2019 17:10, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:53 PM Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Shengjijng, >> >> And how do we prevent that binNMU'ing all these reverse dependencies >> don't pick up other golang changes in unstable? Can you tell us if there >> are any? We don't want to accept more unnecessary packages. > > Is it possible to binNMU against testing(like testing-proposed-update)? > > I'm sure most packages can't migrate to testing after binNMU in unstable. > like etcd, nomad, snapd, umoci... which build-depends > golang-golang-x-sys and/or golang-github-mattn-go-isatty(which are > updated in unstable unexpectedly). Can those packages be reverted to have the content of buster, e.g. with a +really version? Than we can schedule the binNMU's in unstable and have them migrate with these changelog only change packages. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature