Your message dated Thu, 9 May 2019 13:52:48 +0200 with message-id <a3a80dd9-ebbf-9d31-2975-9b1ceb59e35f@debian.org> and subject line Re: unblock: bpftrace/0.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #925203, regarding unblock: bpftrace/0.9-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 925203: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: bpftrace/0.9-1
- From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:18:26 +0100
- Message-id: <155315630699.13545.2006228829792368781.reportbug@neo.luffy.cx>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Please unblock package bpftrace Upstream told me 0.9 is the first release where the API (to write bpftrace code snippets) has been stabilized, so scripts and docs will stop breaking. For example, there was the introduction of "elapsed" variable to record the time since the beginning of the execution. Or the use of the `struct` keyword (like in C) when casting. Without these changes, scripts written by the community may not work on Debian without adaptation. It would therefore be helpful we include this release in the next Debian. The package was never in a stable release. It entered testing the first time a couple of months ago. It is a leaf package. Here is the diffstat (full diff is too big). #v+ CHANGELOG.md | 126 ++ CMakeLists.txt | 40 INSTALL.md | 5 README.md | 39 cmake/FindLibBcc.cmake | 12 debian/changelog | 7 debian/patches/0001-Prevent-empty-trigger-functions-to-be-optimized-away.patch | 27 debian/patches/0002-Detect-kernel-headers-even-if-they-are-splitted-into.patch | 174 --- debian/patches/series | 2 docker/build.sh | 1 docs/internals_development.md | 4 docs/reference_guide.md | 541 +++++++--- man/man8/bpftrace.8 | 10 src/CMakeLists.txt | 4 src/arch/CMakeLists.txt | 6 src/arch/aarch64.cpp | 92 + src/ast/ast.cpp | 8 src/ast/ast.h | 19 src/ast/codegen_llvm.cpp | 80 + src/ast/codegen_llvm.h | 2 src/ast/irbuilderbpf.cpp | 66 - src/ast/irbuilderbpf.h | 4 src/ast/printer.cpp | 6 src/ast/printer.h | 1 src/ast/semantic_analyser.cpp | 255 +++- src/ast/semantic_analyser.h | 10 src/attached_probe.cpp | 40 src/bpforc.h | 8 src/bpftrace.cpp | 116 -- src/bpftrace.h | 18 src/clang_parser.cpp | 58 - src/fake_map.cpp | 11 src/fake_map.h | 1 src/lexer.l | 30 src/list.cpp | 49 src/list.h | 3 src/main.cpp | 65 - src/map.cpp | 64 - src/map.h | 3 src/mapkey.cpp | 31 src/parser.yy | 84 - src/struct.h | 4 src/tracepoint_format_parser.cpp | 99 + src/tracepoint_format_parser.h | 109 +- src/triggers.h | 4 src/types.cpp | 5 src/types.h | 52 src/utils-inl.h | 8 src/utils.cpp | 106 + src/utils.h | 37 tests/CMakeLists.txt | 5 tests/bpftrace.cpp | 76 - tests/clang_parser.cpp | 140 +- tests/codegen.cpp | 5 tests/codegen/args_multiple_tracepoints.cpp | 242 ++++ tests/codegen/builtin_elapsed.cpp | 24 tests/codegen/builtin_probe_wild.cpp | 2 tests/codegen/call_cgroup.cpp | 4 tests/codegen/call_kstack.cpp | 120 ++ tests/codegen/call_ustack.cpp | 126 ++ tests/codegen/general.cpp | 14 tests/codegen/map_key_probe.cpp | 96 + tests/codegen/string_equal_comparison.cpp | 74 - tests/codegen/string_not_equal_comparison.cpp | 74 - tests/codegen/variable_undeclared.cpp | 43 tests/parser.cpp | 68 + tests/probe.cpp | 2 tests/runtime/builtin | 26 tests/runtime/call | 36 tests/runtime/other | 10 tests/runtime/probe | 33 tests/runtime/variable | 4 tests/semantic_analyser.cpp | 25 tests/utils.cpp | 19 tools/biosnoop.bt | 8 tools/dcsnoop.bt | 9 tools/execsnoop.bt | 9 tools/mdflush.bt | 3 tools/oomkill.bt | 2 tools/runqlen.bt | 4 tools/tcpaccept.bt | 2 tools/tcpconnect.bt | 2 tools/tcpdrop.bt | 41 tools/tcpretrans.bt | 39 84 files changed, 2846 insertions(+), 1087 deletions(-) #v- On Debian side, except removing the two patches implemented upstream, there is nothing else than the update of debian/changelog. #v+ diff -Nru bpftrace-0.8+git60-gccac69c2239b/debian/changelog bpftrace-0.9/debian/changelog - --- bpftrace-0.8+git60-gccac69c2239b/debian/changelog 2019-02-22 15:10:27.000000000 +0100 +++ bpftrace-0.9/debian/changelog 2019-03-16 19:07:56.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +bpftrace (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * New upstream release. + * d/patches: drop all patches, applied upstream. + + -- Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> Sat, 16 Mar 2019 19:07:56 +0100 + bpftrace (0.8+git60-gccac69c2239b-2) unstable; urgency=medium * d/patches: add patch to avoid optimizing away BEGIN/END trigger #v- Thanks! unblock bpftrace/0.9-1 - -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental-debug'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJGBAEBCAAwFiEErvI0h2bzccaJpzYAlaQv6DU1JfkFAlyTSM8SHGJlcm5hdEBk ZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEJWkL+g1NSX5iqMP+waMJ63uJ+1hXvhjIR0QXyggRkzfBRSF 9lEPnzQtl48ZbDgf8t8F5/zZPQecbTjh1apFUJMXoJ9HrBA/r86p0PD2fGaCtA1d 6vK48ULEKvxY1q+bWPYLMermnh4v6Nngp141pIVyrY/ZUaDFxJpc2pIKNuNLbuU7 q+gh2kih7K6KDBEYlyYbvsfD08oWH4nG15LzFJT2rfvRG1ehrJDa9/nqDdsGmgKq uj4x3TgI5V9udS2wTzA4XAvWYIDZzrS0PBI+B2o3jISsSTu2fhJnPxOcQmlvvOK/ FicA9PgHQ+3Og60UCtlRoNEGYkPj5/jyd9bEqS+gBnzhWt7UU9+/PdQ4e2QuoBrl NtTvAu7aVdB9doP8kc4Ojm7quipJhkx3ChLQPHTgEyEPpzgjLNIVQl/Dex5Z6OG7 U49jaEimSAw5gbfm6ofr36cr9E1JMgZ2U7ATI7DAF1GqYCBven6o6b+dfjdTpGm9 ccK6XigQRpuTCSiAU6tFHKb+2WnY9e1p3eXCrLIXT8aVBvw4v/McHy9euIqW2X8d MGiDP7IqG3nrLDB1HFmv/ThrHvfJbb/OEUwTlUGv5FTW6X1JPqTuczjsb83qllll ItSIOQIhzIMh0Vouzwuu4Qth9L1nOofdAPouLO3qxkkrE3lhBKHh5lopdSxzya64 qmNnDPSy/Ake =r8cq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org>
- Cc: 925203-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: unblock: bpftrace/0.9-1
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 13:52:48 +0200
- Message-id: <a3a80dd9-ebbf-9d31-2975-9b1ceb59e35f@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87zhnwvsna.fsf@debian.org>
- References: <155315630699.13545.2006228829792368781.reportbug@neo.luffy.cx> <155315630699.13545.2006228829792368781.reportbug@neo.luffy.cx> <[🔎] aa703fde-5400-8cfb-b975-d5748119beea@debian.org> <[🔎] 87zhnwvsna.fsf@debian.org>
Hi Vincent, On 09-05-2019 12:17, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 9 mai 2019 10:28 +02, Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>: > >> I fear you're not going to like my mail, sorry. > > No problem! Good to hear. Thanks for understanding. [...] >> Indeed. At this stage of the release, we are very reluctant to let new >> upstream versions into buster. Therefor I don't want to unblock this >> request. However, given the statements above, should we then be shipping >> bpftrace as all in buster? In my opinion, this is material for >> bullseye. > > I'll ask upstream what he thinks of that. It's still an amazing tool to > have. It means that I now close this bug. If you think the package should *not* be in buster, please file an RC bug against your package. In that case you may want to ping us to remove it. PaulAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---