[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#928005: marked as done (nmu: julia_1.0.3+dfsg-4)

Your message dated Thu, 9 May 2019 10:46:45 +0200
with message-id <101c7a79-07ce-7900-4131-40eacb427112@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#928005: nmu: julia_1.0.3+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #928005,
regarding nmu: julia_1.0.3+dfsg-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
928005: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928005
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu julia_1.0.3+dfsg-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_IE.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IE:en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_IE.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 08:34:27 +0000 Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org> wrote:
> It is the "ALL" architecture that should be rebuilt instead of "ANY".
> Since "ALL" doesn't support binNMU, I think I need a 1.0.3+dfsg-5 upload
> somehow.

Nothing for the release-team to do here then yet, so closing.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: