Hmm. On 06-05-2019 21:52, Paul Gevers wrote: > Also make sure you can help them moving forward with their unblock > request, by making sure your *targeted* fixes are available in unstable. > sa-exim would need to be unblocked first or at the same time, so don't > add unnecessary changes to your package and file an unblock request when > your package lands in unstable. While typing the above, it seems that I mis-remembered the situation a bit. Just to get it clear, is or is not your package currently broken in buster? In other words, from sa-exim point of view, would you need an improved exim package in buster? If the answer to the above is no, the sa-exim package is fine, you want to remove the "buster" tag from bug 926952 to prevent autoremoval from buster. You also want to make sure that the severity of the bugs in sa-exim are correct. As far as I can see at this moment, you only have severity normal bugs. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature