Re: Please verify that buster related suites are functional
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 07:05:32AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:11:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 21:02 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > Hi Security team and backports team,
> > >
> > > According to the release team's checklist we have the following TODO for
> > > you:
> > >
> > > """
> > > Check with security team and backports team that it is possible to build
> > > uploads for -security and -backports
> > > """
> > >
> > > To our knowledge, the relevant suites have already been created
> > > (#917537) and ask that you kindly smoke test them to ensure they work as
> > > intended.
> > >
> > > * Please let us know when you have verified these relevant suites or if
> > > you have any issues with them.
> >
> > We need to know that the signing service can also handle uploads to
> > buster-security, i.e. it can download embargoed binaries and then make
> > source uploads to the same suite.
>
> A first test with a simpler candidate was done from the uploading
> step up to the dak new-security-install step and installing into the
> archive with gpac[1].
>
> But as Ben mentions above, we should as well test the more complex
> case involving the singing service. Ideas on what and how we want to
> proceed here?
Testing the signing-service was done in meanwhile by Ansgar and a
upload of src:linux versioned lower than the current one in buster.
Ansgar found and fixed several problems while going trough the
process, but we should be ready as well from that aspect now.
Regards,
Salvatore
Reply to: