Your message dated Tue, 17 Dec 2019 21:24:15 +0100 with message-id <d6761de2-048d-668e-4c12-79c39f12ba84@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#919641: transition: readline (7 -> 8) has caused the Debian Bug report #919641, regarding transition: readline (7 -> 8) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 919641: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919641 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: readline (7 -> 8)
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:45:38 +0100
- Message-id: <20d82f17-d906-9662-04f4-4562b8ef22f7@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition readline is in experimental for some time, the changes are API compatible, and afaics there are no build failures caused by readline. I filed some RC issues for unrelated ftbfs. A handful of packages need sourceful uploads, like d-shlibs and readline-perl6.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 919641-done@bugs.debian.org, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#919641: transition: readline (7 -> 8)
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 21:24:15 +0100
- Message-id: <d6761de2-048d-668e-4c12-79c39f12ba84@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <d7b77be1-31f4-b2e7-dcc0-542ca4a26a6a@debian.org>
- References: <20d82f17-d906-9662-04f4-4562b8ef22f7@debian.org> <20190726181736.GM26456@powdarrmonkey.net> <d7b77be1-31f4-b2e7-dcc0-542ca4a26a6a@debian.org> <d7b77be1-31f4-b2e7-dcc0-542ca4a26a6a@debian.org>
Hi Matthias, On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 23:17:21 +0200 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote: > I checked that any of these ftbfs for different reasons, and filed RC issues for > those that didn't already have RC reports. It seems like everything either got removed or finally migrated to testing. Closing this bug, thanks for your patience. PaulAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---