Re: Processed: found 939940 in 0.5.1+git20160404-1, tagging 939940, found 939950 in 5.0.0.2456-1, tagging 939950 ...
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 05:09:49AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >>> found 939956 0.6.2-1
> >> Bug #939956 {Done: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>} [src:liblangtag] liblangtag: fails to build with gtk-doc 1.32
> >> Marked as found in versions liblangtag/0.6.2-1.
>
> The bug did not have any "found" version, i.e. all versions smaller than
> the fixing 0.6.3-1 have this bug. While this is technically correct, it
> creates no or noisy version graphs in the BTS. As no versions older than
That is true, yes. I agree with that change.
> I'm also setting "relevant in sid and bullseye" (implying "not relevant
> in any release before stretch, stretch, buster, experimental" regardless
> what "found" and "fixed" say)
OK. But at the time of tagging it was not relevant for sid as 0.6.3-1
fixing this already was in the archive.
> PS: tagging "sid bullseye" where stable and testing have different
> versions is redundant since a "found" version would be sufficient.
Aha. Which will happen tomorrow anyway (normal 5 days waiting time),
so you say yourself the tagging wasn't needed but only the "found".
(As said above, the bug had a fixed version for 9 hours if I count right
already before the tagging)
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: