[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#941078: transition: postgresql-12



Hi Christoph,

On 09-11-2019 19:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Need fixing upstream (and should be ignored and/or removed from
>> testing until that happens):
>>
>> autopkgtest for cstore-fdw/1.6.2-1: amd64: Regression ♻
>> autopkgtest for hypopg/1.1.2-1: amd64: Regression ♻
>> autopkgtest for pgaudit/1.4.0-1: amd64: Regression ♻

^ This just got uploaded moments ago, binNMU'ed on the buildd.

>> autopkgtest for pglogical/2.2.2-1: amd64: Regression ♻
>> autopkgtest for pglogical-ticker/1.4.0-1: amd64: Regression ♻
>> autopkgtest for repmgr/5.0.0-2: amd64: Regression ♻

^ You uploaded a new version, so I assume this is in the wrong list, no?

>> autopkgtest for wal2json/1.0-5: amd64: Regression ♻
> 
> Are the Debian PostgreSQL Maintainers the maintainers for all the above
> packages and are they suggesting to drop the packages from testing? How
> big is the list of reverse dependencies?

And please file bugs about these if they aren't there yet. E.g. hypopg
isn't maintained by the Debian PostgreSQL Maintainers, so a heads-up to
the maintainer before we remove the package from testing would have been
nice.

>> These are OK and need to migrate in parallel with postgresql-common so
>> the list of supported PG versions is in sync:
> 
> How is this enforced? If it is by dependency, the autopkgtests would be
> testing the right combination. At least for either postgresql-common or
> the reverse dependency, but I am seeing a lot of these packages have
> failing autopkgtests on their own.
> 
>> autopkgtest for omnidb/2.16.0+ds-2: amd64: Regression ♻
>> autopkgtest for pg-checksums/1.0-1: amd64: Regression ♻
>> autopkgtest for pg-repack/1.4.5-2: amd64: Regression ♻

^ This one also fails in unstable, so are you sure it's OK?

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: