[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#944009: buster-pu: package ncurses/6.1+20181013-2+deb10u2



Hi,

Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2019-11-06):
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
> 
> On 2019-11-02 19:10, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > I would like to upload ncurses 6.1+20181013-2+deb10u2 to buster, fixing
> > several bugs in tic's parser which have been reported last month.  Two
> > of them are heap buffer overflows that have been assigned CVE numbers
> > and a Debian bug[1], two others are out-of-bound-reads and one an
> > infinite loop.
> > 
> > I have verified that the reported crashes and the infinite loop which I
> > could reproduce in ncurses 6.1+20181013-2+deb10u1 appear to be fixed, at
> > least with the submitted corrupt input files.  Also, the compiled
> > terminfo files in ncurses-base and ncurses-term are identical to the
> > ones currently in buster.
> > 
> > This upload touches the tinfo library which is used in the installer,
> > however to the best of my knowledge the changed functions are only used
> > by tic and not by any other packages.
> 
> Nevertheless I'd appreciate a formal ACK there.

I have spent time trying to get d-i tested using netboot and netboot/gtk
mini.iso images built against the 3 packages available on coccia :

glib2.0_2.58.3-2+deb10u2.dsc
ncurses_6.1+20181013-2+deb10u2.dsc
systemd_241-7~deb10u2.dsc

And all use cases ran fine (4 × netboot-gtk and 1 × netboot — new).
FTAOD, the netboot (text-based) use case is only about French only;
at some point I should implement RTL tests for both graphical and
text-based installers, but time is still a scarce resource.


Anyway: I'm fine with letting all three packages get accepted into pu,
even if I didn't dive into the ncurses patches.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: