On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:59:58AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> From my side, the buster version is much more tested by me, as well as
> somewhat "looked after" by the upstream developer (who, for example,
> contacted me a few months ago to be sure it had a few patches).
>
> Updating the stretch version would also bring in a few features that
> might be interesting for some users:
> * ACMEv2 support (related, ISTR hearing LE wanted to retire ACMEv1 at
> some point, so bringing in support for v2 into stretch earlier would
> be a good idea)
It seems that I've been living out of this world.
So, LE will disable new registrations at ACMEv1 starting next month:
https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/end-of-life-plan-for-acmev1/88430/2
AFAIK there is no plan to disable issueance of renewing certs, but
still, that's a breakage that we should fix.
Either way, I don't think there is a need to rush anything to
stretch-updates, even leaving that broken till the December-ish .-r
should be fine.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature