[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#940817: marked as done (transition: liblouis)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:00:36 +0200
with message-id <764f77b2-1aed-f93c-34a2-4950998c388a@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#940817: transition: liblouis
has caused the Debian Bug report #940817,
regarding transition: liblouis
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
940817: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940817
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello,

The new liblouis release (3.11.0) changed its ABI. I have checked
the rdeps, they build and run fine, except liblouisutdml, which uses
internal functions of liblouis. I have uploaded to experimental the new
upstream release of liblouisutdml (2.8.0) which fixes compatibility with
liblouis, it has no rdeps. Both liblouis and liblouisutdml build fine in
experimental on all release archs.

So to summarize, the new versions of liblouis and liblouisutdml would
have to migrate together, along the rebuilds of rdeps of liblouis.

Samuel

Ben file:

title = "liblouis";
is_affected = .depends ~ "liblouis17" | .depends ~ "liblouis19";
is_good = .depends ~ "liblouis19";
is_bad = .depends ~ "liblouis17";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'proposed-updates-debug'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-proposed-updates-debug'), (500, 'oldstable-proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'buildd-experimental'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.3.0 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- 
Samuel
"c'est pas nous qui sommes à la rue, c'est la rue qui est à nous"

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 24-09-2019 16:25, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
> 
> On 23-09-2019 22:50, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> Paul Gevers, le lun. 23 sept. 2019 21:51:06 +0200, a ecrit:
>>> On 21-09-2019 00:20, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>>> Samuel Thibault, le ven. 20 sept. 2019 10:30:36 +0200, a ecrit:
>>>>> The new liblouis release (3.11.0) changed its ABI. I have checked
>>>>> the rdeps, they build and run fine, except liblouisutdml, which uses
>>>>> internal functions of liblouis. I have uploaded to experimental the new
>>>>> upstream release of liblouisutdml (2.8.0) which fixes compatibility with
>>>>> liblouis, it has no rdeps.
>>>>
>>>> I forgot to mention that the new liblouisutdml doesn't build with the
>>>> old liblouis. That's why they have to go together, I can't upload
>>>> liblouisutdml to unstable yet.
>>>
>>> Please go ahead.
>>
>> They are now in.
> 
> binNMU's scheduled.

I believe it all migrated.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: