Bug#939890: buster-pu: package rpcbind/1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1

To: Josue Ortega <josue@debian.org>
Cc: 939890@bugs.debian.org, "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Subject: Bug#939890: buster-pu: package rpcbind/1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:27:31 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] tslv9u13si4.fsf@suchdamage.org>
Reply-to: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>, 939890@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] a6b0032d2e6051375f29970ab2dbd3f7@debian.org> (Josue Ortega's message of "Mon, 09 Sep 2019 14:26:36 -0700")
References: <[🔎] 156805731668.7862.3594192859954452301.reportbug@Trillian> <[🔎] b3186c6cf86fcadf83716662510812fa91e97292.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> <[🔎] 156805731668.7862.3594192859954452301.reportbug@Trillian> <[🔎] a6b0032d2e6051375f29970ab2dbd3f7@debian.org> <[🔎] 156805731668.7862.3594192859954452301.reportbug@Trillian>

What are the security implications of enabling this configure flag?
Why is it off by default?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#939890: buster-pu: package rpcbind/1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1
  - From: Josue Ortega <josue@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#939890: buster-pu: package rpcbind/1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1
  - From: Josue Ortega <josue@debian.org>
- Bug#939890: buster-pu: package rpcbind/1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Bug#939890: buster-pu: package rpcbind/1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1
  - From: Josue Ortega <josue@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#939908: buster-pu: libsixel/1.8.2-1+deb10u1
Next by Date: Bug#939890: buster-pu: package rpcbind/1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1
Previous by thread: Bug#939890: buster-pu: package rpcbind/1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1
Next by thread: Bug#939890: buster-pu: package rpcbind/1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread