[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#931126: unblock: enigmail/2:2.0.11+ds1-2



Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 23:43 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2019-07-20 21:41:12 -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:21:22PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun 2019-06-30 20:01:21 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > > The time for unblocks for buster has come and gone. The
> > > > deadline was
> > > > last Tuesday, we are now in deep freeze and we were not able to
> > > > process
> > > > your unblock request and give it an exception. I assume this
> > > > should be
> > > > fixed via the security archive, please confirm that (and I'll
> > > > fix this
> > > > bugs metadata). Otherwise I propose you prepare a stable
> > > > release update
> > > > targeting buster, such that this can be fixed in the first
> > > > point release.
> > > 
> > > I'm fine with this going through either security or the first
> > > buster
> > > point release.  So yes, Paul, if you can update this issue to be
> > > treated
> > > as a security issue, that would be great.
> > 
> > Would you prefer to do this as a security upload (in which case
> > this
> > unblock bug should be closed) or as a no-dsa (we will repurpose it
> > for a
> > p-u)?
> 
> At this point, given the upstream changes and the issues with the SKS
> keyserver network, i think we should aim to import 2.0.12 into
> buster, not 2.0.11.
> 
> I would love it if someone else wants to step up and help with this.
> I'm currently working on an update to GnuPG for buster, and have not
> had time yet to do the 2.0.12 upload for Buster (either as a security
> or point release).

Tagging as moreinfo for now, until there's a definite plan and diff
either way.

Regards,

Adam


Reply to: