[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#890935: marked as done (transition: console-bridge)

Your message dated Fri, 26 Jul 2019 20:08:29 -0300
with message-id <20190726230829.GA14815@powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#890935: transition: console-bridge
has caused the Debian Bug report #890935,
regarding transition: console-bridge
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
890935: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890935
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear release team:

console-bridge 0.4.0 is now in experimental, we can start the transition
for the existing packages to the archive currently using console-bridge.
The following source packages need to be rebuild:

ros-actionlib_1.11.12-1
ros-class-loader_0.3.8-1
ros-geometry2_0.5.16-1
ros-rosconsole-bridge_0.5.1-1
ros-roscpp-core_0.6.7-1
urdfdom_1.0.0-2
ros-bond-core_1.8.1-2
ros-ros-comm_1.13.5+ds1-1
ros-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.49-1
ros-geometry_1.11.9-1

I think that in terms of 'ben' lingo, the transition has the following
parameters:

title = "console-bridge";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libconsole-bridge0.2v5" | .depends ~ "libconsole-bridge0.4";
is_good = .depends ~ "libconsole-bridge0.4";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libconsole-bridge0.2v5";

Please schedule binNMUs for the above mentioned packages on all
architectures.

Thanks you.
 Jose

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> uploaded to unstable.
> 
> On 23 Feb 2018 13:51, "Emilio Pozuelo Monfort" <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > On 23/02/18 12:14, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> > > On 23/02/18 10:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Please schedule binNMUs for the above mentioned packages on all
> > >>> architectures.
> > >>
> > >> First you need to upload console-bridge to unstable. Before doing that,
> > have you
> > >> tested that those packages build fine with the new console-bridge?
> > >>
> > >
> > > I ran ratt against the changes file and all the packages listed above
> > > passed the build in experimental (same versions than unstable) without
> > > any error. I assume that the next step is upload console-bridge to
> > > unstable.
> >
> > Yes, go ahead.
> >
> > Emilio
> >

Seems to have been completed; closing.

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

--- End Message ---
Reply to: