On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 05:02:51PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> 于2019年7月20日周六 下午4:33写道：
> >
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: rm
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: doko@debian.org, syq@debian.org, debian-mips@lists.debian.org
> >
> > cross-toolchain-base-mipsen is failing its autopkgtest on testing with
> > the new binutils, and that prevents migrating the new binutils and
> > everything that depends on it (including updates to gcc-8 and gcc-9).
>
> why it happens? why the bug of cross-toolchain-base-mipsen will effect
> binutils and gcc-8/9?
>
> I think that they have no relationship?
check https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/cross-toolchain-base-mipsen/testing/amd64/
cross-toolchain-base-mipsen/2 fails its tests with
binutils/2.32.51.20190707-1, and from what I understand that's quite
expected actually.
In turn, it blocks gcc-* because they require the new binutils.
And quite a few other packages all waiting on binutils, look at
https://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html and grep for
"binutils (not considered)".
Having a package tangled with the toolchain is very easy for it to cause
quite some stalls.
> > From my knowledge, Matthias already warned the porters about this
> > potential removal if cross-toolchain-base-mipsen went unfixed, but
> > nothing happened.
>
> I am very sorry for it as I forgot it.
According to Matthias, he is quite unhappy about how the mips porters
deal with this, with him asking "you" to fix stuff but then he found
himself forced to do it instead. Please consider being more proactive
in the maintenance of these kind of packages, as you otherwise risk
irking people…
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature