[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#931629: marked as done (nmu: rebuild packages for binutils 2.32.51.x)

Your message dated Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:36:00 +0200
with message-id <d2ffe868-b9ec-dbbc-292c-f437add68cee@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#931629: nmu: rebuild packages for binutils 2.32.51.x
has caused the Debian Bug report #931629,
regarding nmu: rebuild packages for binutils 2.32.51.x
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
931629: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931629
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Please binNUM these packages for the recent binutils upload to unstable:

boinc-app-eah-brp 0.20170426+dfsg-10
naev 0.7.0-2
tulip 4.8.0dfsg-2
wcc 0.0.2+dfsg-3 (amd64 only)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Matthias,

On 08-07-2019 14:57, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please binNUM these packages for the recent binutils upload to unstable:
> 
> boinc-app-eah-brp 0.20170426+dfsg-10
> naev 0.7.0-2
> tulip 4.8.0dfsg-2
> wcc 0.0.2+dfsg-3 (amd64 only)

boinc-app-eah-brp can't be rebuild (#887880).
tulip can't be rebuild (#853688, filed by you).

binNMU'ed wcc and naev.

Thanks.

Just one request, can you enlighten me as to where these strict
dependencies on libutils come from?

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: