Your message dated Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:36:00 +0200 with message-id <d2ffe868-b9ec-dbbc-292c-f437add68cee@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#931629: nmu: rebuild packages for binutils 2.32.51.x has caused the Debian Bug report #931629, regarding nmu: rebuild packages for binutils 2.32.51.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 931629: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931629 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: nmu: rebuild packages for binutils 2.32.51.x
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 14:57:00 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 88b07b19-7f0c-cb60-dfc9-d492713b0f69@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please binNUM these packages for the recent binutils upload to unstable: boinc-app-eah-brp 0.20170426+dfsg-10 naev 0.7.0-2 tulip 4.8.0dfsg-2 wcc 0.0.2+dfsg-3 (amd64 only)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, 931629-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#931629: nmu: rebuild packages for binutils 2.32.51.x
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:36:00 +0200
- Message-id: <d2ffe868-b9ec-dbbc-292c-f437add68cee@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 88b07b19-7f0c-cb60-dfc9-d492713b0f69@debian.org>
- References: <[🔎] 88b07b19-7f0c-cb60-dfc9-d492713b0f69@debian.org>
Hi Matthias, On 08-07-2019 14:57, Matthias Klose wrote: > Please binNUM these packages for the recent binutils upload to unstable: > > boinc-app-eah-brp 0.20170426+dfsg-10 > naev 0.7.0-2 > tulip 4.8.0dfsg-2 > wcc 0.0.2+dfsg-3 (amd64 only) boinc-app-eah-brp can't be rebuild (#887880). tulip can't be rebuild (#853688, filed by you). binNMU'ed wcc and naev. Thanks. Just one request, can you enlighten me as to where these strict dependencies on libutils come from? PaulAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---