[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#926778: marked as done (unblock: python3.7 3.7.3 packages)

Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2019 21:16:46 +0200
with message-id <88b5c7fe-a3bd-dcca-3ac1-35ce70a34fe5@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#926778: unblock: python3.7 3.7.3 packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #926778,
regarding unblock: python3.7 3.7.3 packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
926778: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926778
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock python3.7, python3-stdlib-extensions and python3-defaults,
bumping the version to the final 3.7.3 release, and fixing a bus error on armhf,
and avoiding unaligned memory accesses on arm64.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi doko,

On 27-05-2019 16:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 11.05.19 18:56, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:23:15 +0200 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
>>> Please unblock python3.7, python3-stdlib-extensions and python3-defaults,
>>> bumping the version to the final 3.7.3 release, and fixing a bus error on armhf,
>>> and avoiding unaligned memory accesses on arm64.
>>
>> This looks mostly OK (albeit a new upstream release, which we try to
>> avoid unblocking),
> 
> The update beyond 3.7.2 with the goal of 3.7.3 was communicated and approved by
> Emilio (pochu) even before doing the first upload from the 3.7 branch to
> unstable.  Please let me know if there is anything I can do to avoid confusion
> for future uploads.

Just mentioning it would have helped. Even if it would have been me that
approved this, there is so much going on with different packages that it
is easy to loose track of stuff. A word (or even better, a link) would
go a long way.

>> Please make sure that during the release, you document *all* packaging
>> changes in the changelog and if needed, elaborate in the unblock request.
> 
> will do for future uploads.

Much appreciated.

I unblocked the three packages, thanks for your work on Python.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: