[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#929082: marked as done (unblock: razor/1:2.85-4.2)

Your message dated Fri, 17 May 2019 22:00:17 +0200
with message-id <c16a864c-208d-75aa-2b0e-3ef154d67a42@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#929082: unblock: razor/1:2.85-4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #929082,
regarding unblock: razor/1:2.85-4.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
929082: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929082
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal

Please allow razor back in testing, as a freeze exception.

It was autoremoved because there was a RC bug in the BTS, but the
real problem was not in the package itself but in the razor servers
by cloudmark (for which the razor package acts as a client).

The problem is already solved. Details about this in Bug #924583.

I'm filing this only as a DD and long-time user of razor because the
package is currently orphaned (#866833). IMO dropping razor from
buster does not really help our users.

(No debdiff to attach because the problem was solved in the razor
servers, not in the razor package).

Thanks.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 16-05-2019 22:03, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 09:52:45PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Well, if they are maintained by the QA group, there are at least around
>> 90 people notified of stuff.
> 
> no. noone is notified about bugs in packages maintained by the QA group.
> (or maybe some poor soul is, but noone is reading those notices *if*
> someone receives them.)

I have just added an unblock hint. Santiago, could I kindly ask you to
at least monitor the package (e.g. via tracker.d.o) until a new
maintainer steps up?

Don't hesitate to upload a version with the maintainer set to the QA
group *after* the release of buster, despite of the fact that Holger
confirmed my fears.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: