[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#924150: marked as done (stretch-pu: package libdate-holidays-de-perl/1.9-1+deb9u3)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:14:32 +0100
with message-id <1556360072.2690.35.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing bugs for updates included in 9.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #924150,
regarding stretch-pu: package libdate-holidays-de-perl/1.9-1+deb9u3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
924150: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

As I wrote in #902042:

> FWIW, there are currently no further plans to change holidays in
> Germany, so this is hopefully the last update for a long time.

This did not hold. So another round: This time Berlin introduced two
more public holidays, March 8th from 2019 on (first one already passed),
and May 8th one time in 2020.

To keep libdate-holidays-de-perl in sync, I've prepared 1.9-1+deb9u3.
The related upload for sid (2.00-2) happened already a few weeks ago and
has migrated to testing in the meantime. Upload to 9/stretch/stable will
follow in a moment, following the stable release policy change last
year.

Kind regards,

    Christoph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 9.9

Hi,

The update referenced by each of these bugs was included in this
morning's stretch point release.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: