[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#924089: marked as done (RM: openhft-chronicle-threads/1.1.6-1)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2019 22:04:11 +0200
with message-id <4d23a185-28fb-b75a-ae19-4056461982a9@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RM: openhft-chronicle-threads/1.1.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #924089,
regarding RM: openhft-chronicle-threads/1.1.6-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
924089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924089
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

This package fails to build from source (#917738), and unlike with some
other openhft packages, I am not able to get it fixed. I’ve spent days
fixing openhft for Apertis, and my conclusion was that it’s not worth
doing so without getting the upstream to fix things for Java 9—11—12
first.

Unfortunately, removing this package means dropping
openhft-chronicle-queue and openhft-chronicle-network which transitively
depend on it, and also projectreactor and, if I don’t remove the support
for projectreactor in Spring, also libspring-java — but I do have a
patch to do just that.

- -- 
Cheers,
  Andrej

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFIBAEBCAAyFiEEeuS9ZL8A0js0NGiOXkCM2RzYOdIFAlyDvjUUHGFuZHJld3No
QGRlYmlhbi5vcmcACgkQXkCM2RzYOdKYLQgAu9QAtnH4zwQ/H+RJVTgmlTIBOebt
+62RyWBYl/NPo7+fAKABEXDdH75rF+efcJM672fRXjH/+AkHS8C5vKVasRgz1vP8
v8hhwIMai3jVCTPg8D7Fk2ND3NKaMP/U75C+R42i9HWB8GyA8ZLH4k3Zrj5XS21H
FUEcbxTGBXXorX4aUeLBMt+f1PBh5PAqC8oWIj+SMNfA/A3h/mEobFvDzebC9dFu
ux5gXeXumalNILBGk/khi7rBTnU0t4J9Fb/k3L0FJjp7kE712TOkjd17Vm2b7R/4
qa7y3CLDXbJuVGHlvZCyL0ZQrqVrj967gcoStsU4V1wh8npbnqdbTx3Qvg==
=S3aR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Andrej,

On Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:23:03 +0000 Andrej Shadura <andrewsh@debian.org>
wrote:
> This package fails to build from source (#917738), and unlike with some
> other openhft packages, I am not able to get it fixed. I’ve spent days
> fixing openhft for Apertis, and my conclusion was that it’s not worth
> doing so without getting the upstream to fix things for Java 9—11—12
> first.

I think this is moot now that openhft-chronicle-threads/1.1.6-2 is in
testing, right? Thus closing.

Paul

--- End Message ---
Reply to: