[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#924910: unblock: librostlab-blast/1.0.1-10



On 20/03/2019 13:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 01:32:33PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> +  * Do not render PDF documentation any more since its not really important
>>> +    for users and doxygen 1.8.5 breaks the build of PDF documentation
>>> +    Closes: #924834
>>
>> I doubt doxygen 1.8.5 broke this. That's ancient. Also I just tested -9 in sid
>> and it builds fine there. If the build is still broken in testing, maybe there's
>> something in sid that fixed it (not doxygen which is at the same version) and we
>> could possibly unblock it, making this changes unnecessary.
> 
> I'm not sure whether it is worth to do this kind of research since
> simply not providing the PDF (and simply go with the HTML doc which is
> available) in this leaf package is an existing and acceptable solution.
> 
> If lots of other packages would be affected by this issue I think it
> is worth the effort - if its only this package a simple unblock will
> be appropriate.

I have certainly seen other packages failing to build the documentation
recently. I suspect some of these different packages in the buster/sid builds
are probably related:

[-texlive-base_2018.20190131-1
texlive-binaries_2018.20181218.49446-1
texlive-fonts-recommended_2018.20190131-1
texlive-latex-base_2018.20190131-1
texlive-latex-extra_2018.20190131-1
texlive-latex-recommended_2018.20190131-1
texlive-pictures_2018.20190131-1]
{+texlive-base_2018.20190227-2
texlive-binaries_2018.20181218.49446-2
texlive-fonts-recommended_2018.20190227-2
texlive-latex-base_2018.20190227-2
texlive-latex-extra_2018.20190227-1
texlive-latex-recommended_2018.20190227-2
texlive-pictures_2018.20190227-2+}

In any case I haven't investigated further and your change is reasonable, so
I'll unblock it.

Emilio


Reply to: