[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#923927: marked as done (unblock: isospec/1.9.1-5)

Your message dated Fri, 8 Mar 2019 22:26:25 +0000
with message-id <20190308222625.GA22770@powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#923927: unblock: isospec/1.9.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #923927,
regarding unblock: isospec/1.9.1-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
923927: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923927
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package isospec

Greetings, Fellow Debianites and Release Managers,

I would like to advocate for isospec to enter testing if no critical bugs
are found in it:

- isospec is a very small library for science;

The difference between buster/sid version is only packaging, in particular
patching a Makefile to fix the build flags for various architectures on which
the software did not build (two last days work).

I have packaged this software piece myself because my msxpertsuite software
needs them.

I really would like msxpertsuite to be part of stable, because it is a
replacement of massxpert that had a pretty good popularity contest rate. It is
not a recent development, and I currently have a paper in revision where I
pretend it will be in Debian :-).

isospec does not have reverse-dependencies other than msxpertsuite.

In the hope that you will consider this request favorably,

Sincerely,
Filippo

unblock isospec/1.9.1-5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
 APT prefers testing
 APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

--

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Filippo Rusconi, PhD
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   Scientist at CNRS
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   Debian Developer
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  http://msxpertsuite.org
         http://www.debian.org

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:25:29AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> I would like to advocate for isospec to enter testing if no critical bugs
> are found in it:

It's in testing; you want an unblock for the new version. Unblocked.

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

--- End Message ---
Reply to: