[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#907199: marked as done (weboob, Gratuitous sexual references)

Your message dated Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:43:00 +0000
with message-id <26cb4273-bc33-f590-2695-9617fe21a231@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: weboob, Gratuitous sexual references
has caused the Debian Bug report #907199,
regarding weboob, Gratuitous sexual references
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
907199: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907199
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Control: block 906119 by -1

(I sent this as a plain email, after asking on #debian-release what
the best representation in the BTS would be, but I didn't get a useful
reply, so I am resending this as a bug report without any useful
tags.  Sorry for any inconvenience.)

Hi.

Dear Release Team, would you please decide whether
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906119
is, in your opinion, RC ?

(Also, as I imagine this is not so easy, can you please let me know
when I should expect to hear back?)

Marc Dequènes (duck) writes ("Re:  Gratuitous sexual references"):
> Control: tag -1 wontfix
> Control: severity -1 wishlist

As I wrote in my initial mail:

 | If you as maintainer disagree with my assessment, then we should
 | refer the dispute about the bug severity to the Release Team, in
 | accordance with usual practice.

So I am doing that now.

I also wrote:

 | For the avoidance of doubt: if the Release Team feel the project's
 | consensus is not sufficiently clear; or that a removal decision by
 | the Release Team would lack legitimacy, I would quite understand.
 | In that case the right next step would be a General Resolution.  If
 | necessary I will propose and/or sponsor a GR to definitively
 | establish Debian's view that this package is unacceptable.

Marc suggested the TC.  I don't think the TC is appropriate for this
question.

But of course the Release Team could delegate this decision to the TC.
Or, the Release Team might want to informally consult the TC, or other
relevant people in Debian such as the DPL, ftpmaster or the
antiharassment team.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 17:40:24 +0100 Ian Jackson
<ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Control: block 906119 by -1
> 
> [...]
> 
> Hi.
> 
> Dear Release Team, would you please decide whether
>   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906119
> is, in your opinion, RC ?
> 
> [...]

Hi,

This has been resolved by the AH-team + the FTP masters by removing
weboob from Debian.  As such this bug is already closed and with this
mail I am correcting the metadata match the real status of the bug.

Thanks,
~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: