Your message dated Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:35:30 +0100 with message-id <93741ce7-44c5-4be4-2f91-54776c182f1b@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#879644: transition: libzip has caused the Debian Bug report #879644, regarding transition: libzip to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 879644: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879644 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: transition: libzip
- From: Stefan Schoerghofer <amd1212@4md.gr>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 22:00:38 +0200
- Message-id: <1508788838.16598.67.camel@4md.gr>
- Reply-to: amd1212@4md.gr
- In-reply-to: <150878682508.31514.7434755956520709369.reportbug@Atropos.hades>
- References: <150878682508.31514.7434755956520709369.reportbug@Atropos.hades>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi release team, libzip needs a transistion - I've uploaded the new version to experimental, will have to go trough NEW first, though. I don't expect any breakages for binNMUs and will test the build of all reverse-depends. Please let me know when I can upload it to unstable. Cheers, Stefan Ben file: title = "libzip"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libzip4" | .depends ~ "libzip5"; is_good = .depends ~ "libzip5"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libzip4";Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>, 879644-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: amd1212@4md.gr
- Subject: Re: Bug#879644: transition: libzip
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:35:30 +0100
- Message-id: <93741ce7-44c5-4be4-2f91-54776c182f1b@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20190205122039.c2yhpt65snlhm7cl@lorien.valinor.li>
- References: <1508788838.16598.67.camel@4md.gr> <1508788838.16598.67.camel@4md.gr> <1f39df30-e8a5-ebbd-3568-150b31a048a0@debian.org> <[🔎] 20190205122039.c2yhpt65snlhm7cl@lorien.valinor.li>
On 05/02/2019 13:20, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Emilio, Stefan, > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:27:40AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Control: tags -1 moreinfo >> >> On 23/10/17 22:00, Stefan Schoerghofer wrote: >>> Package: release.debian.org >>> Severity: normal >>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org >>> Usertags: transition >>> >>> Hi release team, >>> >>> libzip needs a transistion - I've uploaded the new version to >>> experimental, will have to go trough NEW first, though. >>> >>> I don't expect any breakages for binNMUs and will test the build of all >>> reverse-depends. >>> >>> Please let me know when I can upload it to unstable. >> >> Let us know whether the rdeps build fine and when the package goes >> through NEW. > > At this point probably we can close this transition bug, as there is > no need right now for a transition (in my understanding 1.5.1-2 did > contain a revert/reintroduction of function so that no bump was > required): > >> libzip (1.5.1-2) experimental; urgency=medium >> >> * Reintroduce dummy zip_archive_set_tempdir function to lower the SONAME >> back to libzip.so.4 >> * Revert the soname change back to libzip4 >> * Add Bernd and Stefan as co-maintainers Ok, thanks Salvatore for the notice. Let's close this bug then. Emilio
--- End Message ---