[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#918987: transition: ode



El 13/1/19 a les 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha escrit:
> On 11/01/2019 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 11/01/2019 15:17, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
>>> Subject: transition: ode
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> Dear release team,
>>>
>>> I would like to ask a transition slot for the ode library. Upstream published a
>>> new version with a soname bump. The affected packages can be build without any
>>> problem with the new version (I did it in an pbuilder environment).
>>>
>>> Please accept with transition slot. I know that is too close to Buster freeze.
>>
>> Go ahead.
> 
> And your package fails (and was already failing) to build on several release
> architectures. You should have fixed that before requesting a transition slot.
> 
> Please look at those failures:
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ode
> 

First of all I'm so sorry. I didn't check the build of the package
because I thought that it was built. I was more worried about the
dependencies than the package itself. Upstream told me the there was no
important changes. I check specially ABI changes.

In any case, after I notice the problem I worked on. In some archs there
was a problem in autotest, and in others an assert that for an check
from upstream. The problem was in non common archs.

I pushed a new version of the package yesterday night solving the issue
in some archs and this morning I have pushed another version of the
package with the patches sent by upstream. Also, some people in
#debian-mentors helped me in this issue.

Now, it builds in all the archs expect ia64 because some dependencies,
not the package itself.

I can only say this...


-- 
--
Linux User 152692     GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: