On 09/01/2019 01:27, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team:
>
> simbody 3.6.1+dfsg-1 is now in experimental, we can start the transition
> for the existing package in the archive currently using it.
> The following source package need to be rebuild:
>
> gazebo 9.6.0-1
>
> I think that in terms of 'ben' lingo, the transition has the following
> parameters:
>
> Affected: .depends ~ /\b(libsimbody3\.6|libsimbody3\.5v5|libsimbody3\.5v5\-dbg)\b/
> Good: .depends ~ /\b(libsimbody3\.6)\b/
> Bad: .depends ~ /\b(libsimbody3\.5v5|libsimbody3\.5v5\-dbg)\b/
>
> Sorry for sending this close to the freeze but it will kill the 2 RC bugs pending on Simbody.
> Please schedule binNMUs for gazebo packages on all architectures.
simbody failed to build on several architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=simbody&suite=experimental
Please fix that before we consider starting the transition.
I've upload simbody 3.6.1+dfsg-3 which:
- fixed: all, mips, powerpc, powerpcspe, ppc64el, ppc64
- waiting but probably fixed: mipsel, mips64el, kfreebad-amd64
- still failing: i386, hurd-i386
The build is failing on i368 (will require a bit more of work) but it is already failing on unstable so there is a big gain on architectures supported (+6 at least) and no regression as far as I can say.
Thanks Emilio.