Bug#918677: transition: pacemaker
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 08/01/2019 11:15, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi Release Team,
>
> We'd like to transition to Pacemaker 2. The ben file below is mostly
> equivalent to that of auto-pacemaker, but misses pacemaker-dev, because
> I'm not sure how to handle that. The current lib*-dev packages are
> becoming transitional, depending on pacemaker-dev which is a union of
> them.
>
> The dlm package will also need a rebuild, because it dlopens libstonithd
> and embeds its SONAME at build time. Is there a way to represent this
> in the tracker? Anyway, I'm asking upstream for a new release, and will
> do a sourceful upload once that happens (latest). Would adding a
> Recommends: libstonithdX let the auto tracker pick up this weak
> dependency?
No, unless the tracker had a .recommends in is_affected etc.
> We expect sbd to break with the new Pacemaker libraries, and will handle
> this with sourceful uploads.
>
> I don't know of any other dependencies, this should be a very shallow
> transition despite all the library packages taking part. Please let me
> know when I can upload Pacemaker 2 to unstable.
Since you are taking care of the two rdeps, go ahead.
Emilio
Reply to: