Bug#915721: transition: opencv
- To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 915721@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#915721: transition: opencv
- From: Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2019 04:46:02 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20190106044601.GA10798@Asuna>
- Reply-to: Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org>, 915721@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20181231101419.GA1065@Asuna>
- References: <20181206120941.GA17015@Asuna> <20181206120941.GA17015@Asuna> <c243a7e4-1cf7-6469-c731-9421019458a4@debian.org> <20181206120941.GA17015@Asuna> <20181224014944.GA18189@Asuna> <20181206120941.GA17015@Asuna> <20181227113517.GA27929@Asuna> <20181206120941.GA17015@Asuna> <20181231101419.GA1065@Asuna> <20181206120941.GA17015@Asuna>
Hi,
Any updates? Transition freeze is close. The current version of OpenCV
(3.2.0) in Sid is quite ancient (Dec 23, 2016).
mips{,64}el buildd are again lagging behind the other architectures for
the last binNMU. And before any ack I'm not going to manually build it
again on mips box since I'm not buildd.
Builds for 3.4.5+dfsg-1~exp1 were successful so I don't expect any
problem for 3.4.5+dfsg-1~exp1+b1 .
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 10:14:20AM +0000, Mo Zhou wrote:
> I've uploaded opencv 3.4.5 to experimental which fixed some issues found
> in the previous version. This time mipsel and mips64el is still lagging
> behind other other architectures. I'll build binaries by myself for the
> two architectures and I don't expect any buiid failure.
Reply to: