[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#917196: marked as done (transition: qtbase-opensource-src)

Your message dated Thu, 3 Jan 2019 09:51:30 +0100
with message-id <ab23d0e6-e9df-687c-55dd-011741201733@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#917196: transition: qtbase-opensource-src
has caused the Debian Bug report #917196,
regarding transition: qtbase-opensource-src
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
917196: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917196
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi! We are *almost* ready to go ahead with the last Qt transition for Buster.

This time is a simple pure-bugfixes release, to the point that we need it only
for qtbase: qtdeclarative should just work.

It would be great if you could set up the transition page so I can check rdeps
easily. I'll of course ping this bug when we are ready to start the transition.

Ben file:

title = "qtbase-opensource-src";
is_affected = .depends ~ "qtbase-abi-5-11-2" | .depends ~ "qtbase-abi-5-11-3";
is_good = .depends ~ "qtbase-abi-5-11-3";
is_bad = .depends ~ "qtbase-abi-5-11-2";


Thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, arm64, armhf

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=es_AR:es (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 03/01/2019 00:12, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Hi Nicholas!
> 
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 19:19, Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 11:08:52PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>>> Hi! For what I understand, at this point, we currently need to:
>>>
>>> - Wait for calibre being built
>>> - Somehow make ci.debian.net understand that the latest kdeconnect upload
>>> fixed a buggy test (so not really a qt issue, just a race condition in the
>>> test)
>>> - Wait ~1 more day.
>>
>> At this time (2 jan) would it be better to upload the new upstream
>> version of Calibre, or to wait a bit longer?  "Wait for calibre being
>> built" seems like the upload might help the transition :-)
> 
> The transition is already over, Qt is in testing.

Closing this bug.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: