[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#884635: transition: libupnp



Hello Sebastian,

On 09/30/2018 10:09 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2017-12-22 22:38:23, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:07:16PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> Currently there are two versions of libupnp in the archive:
>>>
>>>  - src:libupnp providing the 1.6.x branch of libupnp which is considered
>>>    legacy by upstream
>>>  - src:pupnp-1.8 providing the 1.8.x branch of libupnp
> 
> The list of open issues is down to:
> 
>>  - amule
>>    - FTBFS #884996 (patch)

The patch was forwarded
(https://github.com/amule-project/amule/issues/126), no response so far.
The patch needs libupnp-1.6.25 or ..-1.8 which are both available in Debian.

>>  - djmount
>>    - FTBFS #884243

The upstream maintainer doesn't care any more and the Debian maintainer
wrote in May "I lack of free time right now, but will engage on this as
soon as I can.". Nothing happend so far.

>>  - gmrender-resurrect
>>    - FTBFS #884246

upnp-upstream supported here to come up with a patch. gmrender-resurrect
was recently uploaded and not build-depends on libupnp1.8-dev and so is
out of the hot path for this transition.

>>  - linphone
>>    - FTBFS #884247

Fixed in unstable.

> Those still fail to build.
> 
>>  - gmediaserver
>>    - FTBFS #884245
> 
> RM requested.

It would be great if
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=0;dist=unstable;ordering=normal;repeatmerged=0;src=gmediaserver
included this bug (#904833).

> Considering that those packages had over 9 months to get fixed, I think we
> should start the transition and RM the unfixed packages from testing.

+1

I don't know what needs to be done from my side. I guess James and I
have to prepare an upload of libupnp6 and libupnp1.8 where the
libupnp-dev package moves from the former to the latter? According to
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions we should wait for
an ACK by the release team. Should I upload libupnp6 with libupnp-dev
dropped to experimental? (pupnp-1.8 is in experimental providing
libupnp-dev already.)

Best regards
Uwe


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: