On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 04:01:59PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:22:35PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
> > > Is it still useful to block openssl 1.1.1 testing migration with this bug?
> >
> > Things like python are also blocked on it. I have no problem
> > lowering the severity of this issue, to make it migrate.
>
> I'm not sure who should decide this if not you :)
>
> Copying Paul and the release team. Any thoughts?
I'm neither Paul nor the release team, but I honestly think that at the
very least the openssl maintainers could at least fix their own tests.
And possibly write some patches and do NMUs for those reverse
dependencies where Kurt suggested to create new certificates to be used
during the tests.
And, Adrian (Bunk): what are your thoughts about the versioned breaks?
Could you maybe start compiling a list?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature