[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#901015: transition: protobuf



Hi Emilio,

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:56 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
<pochu@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 11/09/2018 09:51, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > The last package which fails is gazebo which seems to be team
> > maintained but it has two NMUs already. There's no bug reported here
> > for the protobuf update but upstream aware of it and has a patch[1].
> > This one is not yet tested by me, but the upstream BTS contains a
> > comment that's a working fix for gazebo 7.x and the original bug
> > report[2] states that the fix is in place for the 8.x and 9.x versions
> > as well. If you have time, please file a bug for this to the gazeboo
> > source package - but as noted its Debian maintainers are not very
> > active.
>
> Sounds good. Please go ahead with the transition and bump the bugs to serious.
 Uploaded ProtoBuf with the latest gRPC to Sid. Already built on most
release architectures, only mips64el and mipsel have still these in
their build queue.
Reverse dependencies seems to be updated expect Gazebo. Raised its bug
severity[1].

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/908854#10


Reply to: