Bug#903656: stretch-pu: package publicsuffix/20180523.2326-0+deb9u1

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 12:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Thu 2018-07-12 11:25:58 -0400, dkg@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
> > Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
> > 
> > This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it
> > current is useful for all the packages that depend on it.
> > 
> > The debdiff from the previous version in stretch is not attached
> > because it was being rejected as spam.
> > 
> > This proposed release is also available at the
> > "publicsuffix_debian/20180523.2326-0+deb9u1" tag on the
> > "debian/stretch" branch at
> > the git repo for publicsuffix packaging:
> > 
> >     https://salsa.debian.org/debian/publicsuffix
> > 
> > Please followup on this ticket to confirm whether I should upload
> > this
> > revision to stretch.
> 
> I've tried multiple times now to attach the debdiff to this bug
> report,
> and it continues to be rejected as spam by bugs.debian.org with this
> message:
> 
>  <903656@bugs.debian.org>: host buxtehude.debian.org[209.87.16.39]
> said: 550
>      malware detected: Sanesecurity.Jurlbl.db3039.UNOFFICIAL: message
> rejected
>      (in reply to end of DATA command)

I'd be interested to know if that's still the case. Does changing the
compression format help?

Please go ahead.

Regards,

Adam