Bug#908345: transition: ldc / phobos 81

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>]

Control: tags -1 confirmed pending

On 13/09/2018 14:11, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Am Mo., 10. Sep. 2018 um 22:17 Uhr schrieb Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>:
>>
>> Matthias Klumpp:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>> Yet another LDC ABI and standard library transition is currently going
>>> on (since D does not provide a stable ABI, this happens with every
>>> upload of a new LDC release).
>>>
>>> The Ben file that was auto-generated looks okay to me:
>>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ldc.html
>>> (for some reason it switched to "!?" state recently though, likely due
>>> to LDC migrating to testing before the transition was done.)
>>>
>>> Is it still necessary to create transition tracking bugs for correctly
>>> auto-generated transitions? Or should I in that case just wait for the
>>> release team to schedule bugs on their own at some point?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>     Matthias
>>>
>>
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> I tried scheduling binNMUs for libundead and glib-d but they both FTBFS.
>>
>> Could you please review the issues and file bugs (or upload fixes) to
>> resolve the situation?
> 
> Bugs have been filed (not by me though, I was too slow...), and the
> two issues that cause the rebuild failure are both upstream issues,
> one unrelated to the LDC transition[1], and one[2] directly related.
> I'll write again if these issues have been fixed in some way in
> Debian, and another rebuild can be attempted.

It'd be good if you can mark those bugs as blocking this one, so that we can
easily track what's missing to finish the transition.

Thanks,
Emilio