Bug#905996: nmu: clsync_0.4.1-1
Aurelien Jarno:
> [...]
>>
>> Hi Aurelien,
>>
>> If the goal is to make testing free of packages (Pre-)Depending on
>> multiarch-support
>
> Yes, that's exactly the goal, that way we can just stop building the
> package in the next upload. There are still a few depending packages
> in sid/experimental, but given the bug reports have been sent with
> patches attached more than one year ago, I don't mind breaking them.
>
Ok, thanks for confirming.
>> then removing clsync from testing is also an option
>> AFAICT.
>>
>> I am considering since clsync has had its FTBFS bug against sid for
>> almost 2 years now with no reaction from its maintainers.
>
> That solution has the same result than the binNMU, so that's also fine
> for me. I would leave the decision about what is the best way to achieve
> that to the release team.
>
> Thanks,
> Aurelien
>
Could you please file an RC bug against clsync that affects the
*testing* version (tags sid + buster if that version is also in stable)
about this issue?
I am happy to consider removing clsync earlier than the auto-removal
would have if time is an issue.
Thanks,
~Niels
Reply to: