On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 06:37:00AM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:84;0;0c > Niels Thykier: > > Chow Loong Jin: > >> Package: release.debian.org > >> Severity: normal > >> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > >> Usertags: transition > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> There was an ABI break without soname bump in libtinyxml2-6 recently[1], > >> and I've renamed the package to libtinyxml2-6a as a consequence. > >> > >> Unfortunately, I neglected to read > >> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions prior to filing > >> this transition request and have already uploaded libtinyxml2-6a to > >> unstable. Sorry about that. > >> > >> The following packages are impacted: > >> [...] > >> > >> Given that the ABI break is just the addition of a struct member, no > >> sourceful changes are needed, and binNMUs should be sufficient for the > >> above packages. > >> > >> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898535 > >> > >> [...] > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for reporting the transition so we can finish it. :) > > > > I have scheduled the binNMUs for "Dependency level 2" in the transition > > tracker (see https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-tinyxml2.html) > > > > Please keep an eye on the buildd logs for the relevant packages and file > > RC bugs as necessary if builds starts to fail. > > > > Thanks, > > ~Niels > > > > Hi, > > It seems that rebuilding ignition-common, kido and sdpb does not make > them pick up the dependency on libtinyxml2-6a (they seem to stay with > the old version). Hi, Both ignition-common and sdpb properly pick up the correct dependency when built with sbuild on my machine, while kido simply FTBFS. Looking at the timestamps on the build logs, it looks like the binNMUs didn't happen. > Could you please investigate and file bugs as necessary (or update > tinyxml2, if the bug is there - e.g. in symbols files or the shlibs > file)? -- Kind regards, Loong Jin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature