El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2018 09:39:48 -03 Paul Gevers escribió:
> Dear Lisandro,
>
> On 06-08-18 13:35, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > On one side Maxy told me that many autopkg tests would need fixing due to,
> > if my mind does not fails, gcc 8.
>
> It may have slipped in, because the autopkgtests were so much broken for
> a while that I didn't check carefully if a regression was in the Qt
> stack. After a while, the abi-compliance check was broken in the
> reference as well, so maybe regressions due to gcc are now hidden.
> Luckily the abi-compliance checker is now fixed and there are very
> limited regressions in the Qt stack at this moment, ktexteditor is the
> only one I am aware of.
I see, thanks! Note that I have almost no idea wrt autopkg tests as we don't
use it in the Qt stack.
> > On the other I took a look at the failed test (keys mapping in vi input
> > mode) an tried with kate on my machine running Qt 5.11 without issues, so
> > I'm suspecting the issue is indeed in the test itself.
>
> As I have kate on my system (buster, not fully up-to-date), I tried to
> reproduce the reference as it seems that the test is doing something
> simple. It appears to create a sting, executes some vim commands and
> checks that the outcome is as expected. So it seems unlikely to me that
> this should change. To me, either the old code was doing something
> weird, or the new code is doing it wrong. The test says "Vim is weird"
> so it really looks like the old result is correct. Weirdly enough I get
> the same results as the "new" results of the test. So I suspect I am
> doing something wrong, as I should get the reference. Which keys did you
> press? Do you know what they _should_ do (my vim knowledge is close to
> containing only ":q").
I used i, d, v, y, shift+p. I even retried them just now in case I missed
something.
I might be missing something, but at this point:
- If there is a regression:
* it would be small and can be worked around by using the normal editing
mode.
* odds are highly on the bug-on-kdepim side, as Qt 5.11.1 is just a patch
release of 5.11.0 which has been shipped in other distros for months
already (we skip even releases due to the fact that we need to do
transitions).
* If the bug is in kdepim then the best way to solve it would be to psuh a
new version, for which we need a transition.
- No users have complained about this so far, and we do have lots of users
using unstable and reporting bugs. This has proven to be a nice regression
method so far ;-)
So I think the best way to go here is just let Qt migrate.
Regards, Lisandro.
--
lo cual parece incompatible.
lógica, esa tendrá particiones dentro,
si se transforma la extendida a
tiene particiones lógicas, luego
extendida. Una extendida
estar dentro de una partición
Una partición lógica necesita
Diga NO al topposting.
Matias Silva Bustos
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.