[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#890322: marked as done (transition: libgweather 3.27)



Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2018 10:00:52 +0100
with message-id <20180704090052.GA2249@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#890322: transition: libgweather 3.27
has caused the Debian Bug report #890322,
regarding transition: libgweather 3.27
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
890322: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890322
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

I request permission to start the libgweather transition. The new
version of libgweather is required for GNOME 3.28.

https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-tracker.html

I have completed test rebuilds in my PPA. evolution-data-server,
gnome-applets, and gnome-panel need cherry-picked patches. Since they
are all Debian GNOME packages, I can do those uploads.

After that, we'll need binNMUs for evolution, gnome-clocks,
gnome-initial-setup, and gnome-settings-daemon.

https://launchpad.net/~jbicha/+archive/ubuntu/templibgweather/+packages

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 at 08:03:38 -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> I request permission to start the libgweather transition. The new
> version of libgweather is required for GNOME 3.28.

This has reached testing. Closing the transition request.

    smcv

--- End Message ---

Reply to: