Bug#892802: transition: efl
On 24/03/18 16:21, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2018-03-13 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
>> On 13/03/18 08:15, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
>
>>> Hello,
>
>>> I'd like to request a transition for efl from experimental -> unstable. This
>>> release takes over a few other source packages. It also reverses some
>>> Debian-local ABI & soname deviations from the upstream releases.
> [...]
>> It looks good. Please go ahead and upload the affected packages to unstable,
>> then I'll schedule the binNMUs for the "bad" packages listed in
>
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-efl.html
>
> Hello Emilio,
>
> efl has been built on all archs it is going build[1], could you please
> trigger the first run of binnmus?
>
> FWIW the auto-efl tracker does not seem to work at all, I guess because
> "good" and "bad" are not disjunct.
Scheduled now. Note that efl is bd-uninstallable on s390x because luajit is not
available there. That's going to be a blocker, and needs action, whether by
removing efl and rdeps from s390x, or preferably by making efl build (which can
happen by disabling lua support, assuming that's an option, or by fixing luajit).
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: