Bug#886182: transition: glibc 2.26
On Tue, 02 Jan 2018 at 22:47:45 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 02/01/18 22:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > a few packages are using libc internal symbols and have to be
> > rebuilt for this transition:
> > - apitrace
> > - bro
> > - dante
> > - libnih
> > - libnss-db
> > - p11-kit
> > - unscd
> >
> > Here is the corresponding ben file:
> > title = "glibc";
> > is_affected = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<</;
> > is_good = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.27\)/;
> > is_bad = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.26\)/;
The new glibc is now showing as Installed on all release
architectures. Please could you schedule binNMUs for those packages?
(In particular, I'm trying to release ostree to fix a RC bug, but it now
fails to build due to a hilarious dependency chain involving
gjs -> libgtk-3-0 -> dconf-gsettings-backend -> dconf-service ->
dbus-user-session -> libpam-systemd -> systemd-shim -> cgmanager -> libnih1
due to CTTE decision #746578 preferring systemd-shim over systemd-sysv.)
smcv
Reply to: