[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#917888: marked as done (nmu: mustache-d_0.1.3-3 [armel])



Your message dated Mon, 31 Dec 2018 12:30:00 +0000
with message-id <9925bcbd-06cb-da40-5a88-c018029b7f07@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#917888: nmu: mustache-d_0.1.3-3 [armel]
has caused the Debian Bug report #917888,
regarding nmu: mustache-d_0.1.3-3 [armel]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
917888: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917888
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-CC: mak@debian.org

Please rebuild mustache-d on armel and x32 (as was done on other
architectures). This might allow the latest glib-d to migrate to
Testing.

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mustache-d

Here's my guess at the syntax:

nmu mustache-d_0.1.3-3 . armel x32 . -m 'Rebuild against
libphobos2-ldc-shared82.'

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Jeremy Bicha:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> X-Debbugs-CC: mak@debian.org
> 
> Please rebuild mustache-d on armel and x32 (as was done on other
> architectures). This might allow the latest glib-d to migrate to
> Testing.
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mustache-d
> 
> Here's my guess at the syntax:
> 
> nmu mustache-d_0.1.3-3 . armel x32 . -m 'Rebuild against
> libphobos2-ldc-shared82.'
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeremy Bicha
> 

Scheduled, thanks.

~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply to: