[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#907199: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?



Pandering to the monkeys is hardly a way to run your organization. Have you checked how many OTHER packages are named with the letters "boob" in your repo? Please. The correct decision is to tell the monkeys to get a life.

On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 01:02:34 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=c3=adn_Ferrari?= <tincho@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am writing on behalf of the Anti-Harassment team, as our input has
> been requested on this issue.
>
> Our understanding, after reading the mail threads and bug reports, is
> that the package in its current shape is against the Debian CoC ("be
> respectful") -- while it's not a "flagrant" violation,
>
> As Gregor Herrmann eloquently[1] put it, it's "not ok to use the boobs
> theme for a web scraper or other software unrelated to boobs [sic]
> themselves, where its only function is to make a small group of users
> giggle while objectifying, offending or boring the rest of the world."
>
> We appreciate uploading a new version without the insults (and thank
> Jonathan Dowland for his efforts[2][3] on this front). Please note that
> the insults and homophobic language *is* a flagrant violation of
> Debian's CoC and in our opinion, Debian should not ship new software
> including them.
>
> We believe the next release should not contain the package in question
> in its current state; our recommendation would be to either work with
> upstream on correcting these issues, forking and/or patching it, or just
> removing the package. There is still enough time to find a solution that
> respects our users and our community while keeping a useful piece of
> software in the archive. We would also encourage all parties to be
> respectful, and to observe the community needs for a healthy environment
> where such puerile humour taken at the expense of other people is not
> acceptable any more.
>
> If this dispute cannot be resolved amicably and timely, we believe the
> FTP-master team can -and should- unilaterally remove the package from
> the archive. We think that invoking the CTTE or calling a GR would
> unnecessarily cause more disruption and draw energy from the community.
>
>
> Martín Ferrari, on behalf of the Anti-Harassment team.
>
>
> [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/07/msg00428.html
> [2]: https://git.weboob.org/weboob/devel/merge_requests/228
> [3]: https://git.weboob.org/weboob/devel/issues/154
>
> --
> Martín Ferrari (Tincho)
>

Reply to: