[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#916351: transition: dpdk



On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:26:33 +0000 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Dear release team,
> 
> We would like to move the new DPDK LTS release 18.11-1 from
> experimental to unstable. This breaks the various libraries ABI
compat,
> so a transition is needed.
> 
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dpdk
> 
> The new DPDK packages are all in experimental, having passed the NEW
> que
> ue, and have built on all supported architectures.
> 
> Note that from this project follows a boost-like model, so
> the ABI revision is named after the upstream major version (eg:
librte-
> eal17.11 -> librte-eal18.11). This is done because most libraries
built
> from DPDK break ABI compat on every single major release.
> 
> Reverse build dependency source packages:
> 
> collectd:
> 
> The reverse dependency builds needs a source update to build with
this
> new version, to do with autoconf. The fix has been merged upstream
[1]
> and backported to the stable branch currently in sid [2].
> I have opened a bug and attached a patch, which I verified works [3].
> It seems like there's another bug which should be fixed to allow
> migration, but the change is quite simple. I have prepared a source
NMU
> which I could upload if necessary.
> 
> Note that although collectd only recommends the dpdk libraries, it
does
> so because the plugin is optional. The plugin still needs to be
rebuilt
> against the new libraries ABIs to work.
> 
> virtio-forwarder:
> 
> This package has never entered testing as of yet, due to another bug
> (which seems very simple to solve). The issue with DPDK is that
virtio-
> forwarder imports DPDK's makefiles rather than shipping its own, and
> these are deprecated. I reported this downstream [4] and upstream
[5].
> Given it's not in testing I have not yet prepared a patch. I might do
> so in the next few days.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> Luca Boccassi
> 
> [1] https://github.com/collectd/collectd/pull/3015
> [2] https://github.com/collectd/collectd/pull/3017
> [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915419
> [4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915417
> [5] https://github.com/Netronome/virtio-forwarder/issues/3

I have a tentative fix for virtio-forwarder, sent upstream and debdiff
attached to the relevant bug.

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: