On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 02:37:03PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > This would need to be versioned as 2.2.3+deb9u1.
> But it's exactly the 2.2.4 release published to unstable - why the
> different version number?
(It's not "exactly the same" - the stretch upload will be built in a
stretch
chroot, so may well end up with different dependencies. At the very
least,
it needs a d/changelog entry detailing that it was uploaded to stable,
which
makes it different from the unstable upload.)
so why not 2.2.4~deb9u1 then?