On 2018-11-28 13:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 14/11/2018 23:10, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Dear release team, > > > > I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.28. It is available in > > experimental for almost 3 weeks and there is no known issue or > > regression. It's also the version shipped in Ubuntu 18.10. It has been > > built successfully on all release architectures. It fails to builds on a > > few non-release architectures, but only due to a few testsuite issues > > that needs to be investigated and which do not looks really worrying. > > > > As the glibc is using symbol versioning, there is no soname change. That > > said a few packages are using libc internal symbols and have to be > > rebuilt for this transition: > > - apitrace > > - bro > > - dante > > - libnih > > - libnss-db > > - p11-kit > > - unscd > > > > Here is the corresponding ben file: > > title = "glibc"; > > is_affected = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<</; > > is_good = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.29\)/; > > is_bad = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.28\)/; > > > > In addition a few new symbols have been added that might prevent a few > > other packages to migrate to testing until glibc migrates if they pick > > up the new symbols. Most of those symbols are related to C11 thread or > > narrowing math functions from TS 18661-1. I doubt they are used in a lot > > of packages yet. > > > > Thanks for considering. > > Please go ahead. > Thanks, I have just uploaded it. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature