[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#912853: transition: icu



Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 11/11/2018 11:24, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 4:45 PM Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org> wrote:
>> I'd like to upload ICU 63.1 which was recently released for Buster.
>  I still miss the last three packages rebuilt, but I don't expect any
> problems with those.
> First, my methodology was to build the related packages both on i386
> and amd64 (32 and 64 bit) to detect all possible problems in advance.
> If a package failed due to ICU, I've patched it. If the reason was not
> clear, rebuilt the package for Sid to check that result as well.
> The order of rebuilds was harfbuzz -> boost1.67 -> make boost-defaults
> point to it, then all other packages.
> 
> level 1
> widelands FTBFS, patched it.
> 
> level 2
> boost1.63 (sid only) FTBFS due to Python issue already filed as #902921
> hfst-ospell FTBFS, patched it.
> mozjs60 FTBFS, unrelated linking issue, not yet filed
> nodejs FTBFS, ICU issue is patched, SSL self test problem already
> filed as #902512
> openttd FTBFS, patched it
> ruby-charlock-holmes FTBFS, patched it
> sword FTBFS, patched it
> tarantool FTBFS due to cURL issue already filed as #913380
> 
> level 3
> hhvm (sid only) FTBFS due to self test problem already filed as #907305
> libfolia FTBFS, patched it
> libkiwix FTBS, patched it
> ncmpcpp FTBFS, patched it
> 
> level 4
> gnucash FTBFS due to self test problem
> haskell-blogliterately build dependencies are uninstallable, can't test
> kopanocore FTBFS due to PHP problem already filed as #911360
> odil FTBFS for unknow problem and under investigation
> ucto FTBFS, patched it
> xiphos FTBFS, can be related to #913070 (sword transition)
> 
> level 5
> frog FTBFS, patched it
> 
> I have to leave soon, but plan to file the ICU FTBFS bugs and patches
> in the evening.
> The last three package rebuild probably will happen tomorrow. There's
> no more problem expected, but even if that may happen, I can patch
> that quick.

Please go ahead with this. I will ack the boost transition once this is built.

Cheers,
Emilio


Reply to: