Your message dated Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:30:36 +0100 with message-id <6bb88dde-adc3-beb1-d96c-acf4aad9c351@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#911631: nmu: rdeps of xapian-core round 3 has caused the Debian Bug report #911631, regarding nmu: rdeps of xapian-core round 3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 911631: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911631 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Cc: ben@debian.org
- Subject: nmu: rdeps of xapian-core round 3
- From: Olly Betts <olly@survex.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:45:30 +1300
- Message-id: <20181022194530.GA4026@survex.com>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu This is a second follow-up to my previous request binnmu request: https://bugs.debian.org/910549 Since then, packagesearch 2.7.10 was uploaded to unstable with amd64 binaries built against an out-of-date xapian-core (1.4.7-2, rather than 1.4.7-4 which fixed the issue that required these binNMUs). nmu packagesearch_2.7.10 . amd64 . -m 'Rebuild against libxapian30 with dependency in shlibs' dw packagesearch_2.7.10 . amd64 . -m 'libxapian-dev (>= 1.4.7-4)' Cheers, Olly P.S. for the maintainer of packagesearch: Ben, please ensure your build chroot is up-to-date (it must have been 2 weeks or more out of date for this to happen). Also, there's no need to be uploading binaries unless the package needs to go through NEW (which would also have avoided this happening in this case) - see: https://wiki.debian.org/SourceOnlyUploadAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Olly Betts <olly@survex.com>, 911631-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#911631: nmu: rdeps of xapian-core round 3
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:30:36 +0100
- Message-id: <6bb88dde-adc3-beb1-d96c-acf4aad9c351@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20181022194530.GA4026@survex.com>
- References: <20181022194530.GA4026@survex.com>
On 22/10/2018 21:45, Olly Betts wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > This is a second follow-up to my previous request binnmu request: > > https://bugs.debian.org/910549 > > Since then, packagesearch 2.7.10 was uploaded to unstable with amd64 > binaries built against an out-of-date xapian-core (1.4.7-2, rather > than 1.4.7-4 which fixed the issue that required these binNMUs). > > nmu packagesearch_2.7.10 . amd64 . -m 'Rebuild against libxapian30 with dependency in shlibs' > dw packagesearch_2.7.10 . amd64 . -m 'libxapian-dev (>= 1.4.7-4)' Scheduled. Emilio
--- End Message ---