[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#910065: stretch-pu: package libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl/1.542-1



Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed

On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 14:24 +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Le 31/10/2018 à 13:57, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > On 2018-10-08 06:18, Xavier wrote:
> > > Le 06/10/2018 à 18:43, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 11:10 +0200, Xavier Guimard wrote:
> > > > > libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl contains some
> > > > > viruses in its
> > > > > tests files (#864800). This update proposes to clean sources.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Since debdiff contains virus signatures, it can not be
> > > > > embedded here
> > > > > (rejected by SMTP server). I put it on qa.debian.org server:
> > > > > /home/yadd/libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl_1.542-
> > > > > 1.debdiff
> > > > 
> > > > +libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl (1.542+deb9u1-1)
> > > > stable-
> > > > proposed-updates; urgency=medium
> > > > 
> > > > The version there is odd. Normally it would be 1.5242-1+deb9u1. 
> > > > Is this
> > > > an attempt to indicate that the source tarball has changed,
> > > > i.e. a  new
> > > > "upstream" version? If so, I'd prefer 1.542+repacked-1~deb9u1,
> > > > as a
> > > > backport from unstable, with the changes that don't immediately
> > > > look
> > > > appropriate reverted:
> > > > 
> > > >    * Declare compliance with policy 4.2.1
> > > >    * Remove dependency to libtest-simple-perl (>= 0.94)
> > > >    * Bump debhelper compatibility to 10
> > > > 
> > > > As an additional note, the preferred changelog distribution is
> > > > simply
> > > > "stretch".
> > 
> > [...]
> > > thanks. New version uploaded to qa.debian.org:
> > > /home/yadd/libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl_1.542-
> > > 1.debdiff
> > 
> > Thanks. That still appears to include the changes mentioned above,
> > however. The Standards-Version bump isn't a huge issue, and the
> > dependency change may well be fine if you can explain a little more
> > about why it's being removed, but in general stable updates
> > shouldn't
> > make changes like debhelper compat bumps where they're not relevant
> > to
> > fixing the issue at hand.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Adam
> 
> Hello,
> 
> thanks. Updated and pushed at the same place (old debdiff moved to
> archives/)

Thanks, please feel free to upload.

Regards,

Adam


Reply to: