[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#864650: marked as done (transition: mumps)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:30:00 +0000
with message-id <102eb140-7825-844c-34dd-a5f276e6627b@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#864650: transition: mumps
has caused the Debian Bug report #864650,
regarding transition: mumps
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
864650: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864650
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

With stretch released, we plan to upgrade our numerical computational
packages:
scalapack to 2.0.2
mumps to 5.1.1
scotch to 6.0
etc

This transition request concerns mumps. It has been behaving itself in
experimental and is enthusiastic to play with the big kids in unstable.

Ben file:

title = "mumps";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libmumps-4.10.0" | .depends ~ "libmumps-5.1.1";
is_good = .depends ~ "libmumps-5.1.1";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libmumps-4.10.0";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:18:15 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
<pochu@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 14/07/17 05:04, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 18:51 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:10:17PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >>>
> >>> That's right.  But it makes it simpler for stable users to just
> >>> grab
> >>> dolfin 2016.2.0-4 from snapshot archives if it hasn't been built
> >>> against new libraries like mumps 5.1.  Minimises the number of
> >>> codependent packages they'd have to pull in.
> >>
> >> In that case, please come back when you're ready to proceed, in case
> >> there
> >> is by then a collision with another transition.
> > 
> > I'm happy with the state of dolfin in testing now.  I'd like to proceed
> > with the MUMPS 5.1 transition now.
> > 
> > Since petsc and slepc will be rebuilt as part of the mumps transition
> > anyway, I'll also upgrade petsc 3.7.6 and slepc 3.7.4. These are not a
> > true transition since their soname does not change.
> 
> Go ahead.
> 
> Emilio
> 
> 


Closing this (long done) transition bug.

Thanks,
~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: