[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#873102: marked as done (transition: imagemagick)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:28:00 +0000
with message-id <03c4f8e3-649d-7139-f6f7-86593aa958d3@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
has caused the Debian Bug report #873102,
regarding transition: imagemagick
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
873102: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important

Hi,

I have just landed an imagemagick version in experimental, that break the ABI. 
Previous ABI used double_t that is not ABI stable...

Could we get a transition of libmagickcore, libmagickwand and libmagick++

I have rebuilded reverse deps a few week ago (waiting for ftpmaster) and it 
was fine.

I will fix ASAP the problems.

I have set the severity to important because I will prefer to get quickly a 
newer imagemagick version due to the number of security bug to backport

Thanks for your work

Bastien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 20:48:22 +0100 roucaries bastien
<roucaries.bastien+debian@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> Done waiting from your side
> >
> > On 16/02/18 14:30, roucaries bastien wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, roucaries bastien
> >> <roucaries.bastien+debian@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> >>> <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
> >>>> Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick
> >>>> Control: severity -1 normal
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote:
> >>>>> Package: release.debian.org
> >>>>> Severity: important
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have just landed an imagemagick version in experimental, that break the ABI.
> >>>>> Previous ABI used double_t that is not ABI stable...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could we get a transition of libmagickcore, libmagickwand and libmagick++
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have rebuilded reverse deps a few week ago (waiting for ftpmaster) and it
> >>>>> was fine.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will fix ASAP the problems.
> >>>>
> >>>> What problems?
> >>>>
> >>>> FWIW this can't start until imagemagick builds on all release architectures:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=imagemagick&suite=experimental
> >>>
> >>> Smell like a compiler bug :S
> >>
> >> Fixed, could you please go for transition. Due to huge backlog of
> >> security problem the sooener the better
> >
> > Go ahead.
> >
> > Emilio
> 
> 


Closing this (long done) transition bug.

Thanks,
~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: